Language
Published Papers Paper Quality Score Human Commentary

Evaluate research after publication

RQL Post-Publication Review provides structured assessment for already published research, connects quality information to a paper record and can extend the workflow to human reviewer commentary.

Post-publication assessment provides research-quality support and documentation. It does not retract, endorse or formally validate an article on behalf of its journal or publisher.

PPR service options

Choose automated, expanded or managed review

Structured assessment

Post-Publication AI Review

$9.90 or 10 credits
  • Upload, DOI or public link
  • Post-publication orientation
  • Paper Quality Score support
  • Paper-profile connection where available
Expanded workflow

PPR + Reviewer Board

$14.90 or 15 credits
  • Everything in PPR
  • Reviewer-board listing
  • Human-comment workflow
  • Public quality-documentation support
Coordinated review

Managed PPR

Custom quoted by review scope
  • Reviewer coordination
  • Progress management
  • Structured review stages
  • Author, journal or organization use

Quality analysis

Add structured quality information to a published paper

MD

Methods signals

Review whether the reported methods are described clearly enough to understand the study approach.

EV

Evidence alignment

Examine how well the reported evidence supports the results, interpretation and conclusions.

RQ

Reporting quality

Identify clarity, completeness and transparency signals in the published report.

RP

Reproducibility signals

Consider whether the article provides enough procedural and reporting detail for further scrutiny.

PQS

Paper Quality Score

Support a structured paper-quality score based on available assessment and review information.

HC

Human comments

Invite qualified reviewers to add scholarly comments through the Reviewer Board workflow.

PR

Paper record

Connect the assessment to an article profile, DOI or public source where available.

DC

Quality documentation

Preserve an organized record of selected assessment and reviewer activity.

Who may use PPR

Review published work from different perspectives

Authors

Document strengths, limitations and improvement priorities after an article has been published.

Journals and publishers

Support post-publication quality review, editorial follow-up and structured article records.

Institutions and research groups

Assess selected published outputs and coordinate broader human-review activity where needed.

Workflow

From published paper to quality record

Step 1 Identify the article

Upload the paper or provide its DOI or public article link.

Step 2 Run the assessment

Generate a structured post-publication review focused on the published record.

Step 3 Review quality signals

Examine methods, evidence, reporting and other available assessment indicators.

Step 4 Add human review

Use the Reviewer Board or managed workflow where human commentary is required.

Step 5 Maintain the record

Connect available scores, comments and quality information to the paper profile.

A post-publication review should be interpreted alongside the article, its data, corrections, journal record and relevant expert judgment. It is not itself a formal retraction, correction or editorial ruling.

Add structured review to a published article

Begin with a DOI, public link or document upload and choose the level of assessment and human-review support.