Published Research Record
Effects of land use types on total soil organic carbon and aggregate stability of soils in Lafia and Doma LGAs, Nasarawa State, Nigeria
Published Paper RecordPaper Information
Publication Date: 2026-02-13 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 43-49
Type: Journal article | Discipline: Agriculture | Subject Area: - | Language: English
DOI: 10.15580/gjas.2026.1.012326011
Abstract
The study was conducted to compare total soil organic carbon (TSOC) and aggregate soil stability statues of soils under different land use types (LUT) in Lafia and Doma LGAs of Nasarawa State Nigeria. A free survey technique was used to identify the most representative sampling point for soil profile studies based on LUT. Three mapping units (MU) were identified in each LGAs and profile pits were used in used in their studies. Routine laboratory procedures were carried out on the samples. The preponderance of sand (73.85% - 85.93%) fraction in the particle size distribution may be influenced by its lithology and its type of their utilization. The silt (5.40%) exhibited uniformity in all the horizons. The SCR were >0.15, indicative of young soil with weatherable reserves. Lowest values of bulk density (1.23gcm-3) and higher total porosity (53.31%) recorded in LUT4 which suggests that continuous LUTs have negative effect on soil aggregate stability especially where SOM accumulate under the forest soil. The pH (KCl) in Doma was rated very strong acid (4.84 - 4.14) while at Lafia was rated slightly acid (6.34) to neutral (6.63) in LUT4. The soils had CN ratio
Files and Links
Enhanced Outputs and RQL Services
Research Media
No video or video abstract has been added for this paper yet.
No MP3/audio version has been added for this paper yet.
AI Review / Language Services
No public AI review, language audit, polish, or translation output has been attached to this paper page yet.
PQS / PPR Status
Paper Quality Score: Pending
PQS means Paper Quality Score. It may appear as AI Preliminary, Human Reviewed, or Certified depending on the evidence used. Learn more
PPR is the post-publication review workflow. PQS is the paper-level score outcome. PQS is not automatically calculated from imported metadata.
PPR Listing: Not Listed
PPR Comments: 0 completed / 2 required for Human Reviewed PQS.
Pending. PQS is not automatically calculated from import metadata.